Date: Tue, 26 May 1998 08:33:12 -0700 From: "Glenn Wallace" <nospam.Glenn.Wallacenopsammix.com> Subject: Re: SAAB depreciation?
>This brings up the issue of post-GM cars yet again. What are people's >thoughts on the reliability of 93/94/95 cars? Are they as reliable >and as well built as any other year, or do they really have some >problems? Is it worth buying a '96, as opposed to a 94 or 95? I was reading a web site (CarPoint or one of those) where the NG900's (94-96) rated much higher in reliability. 94's showed some electrical problems (no mention of V6 lunching) but <=93 vehicles showed up as having quite a lot of problems. Given my choice of NG models, I'd go for a 95-97 over a 94. 96 onward models have the updated rear seat belts for infant restraints. Also the 97 onwards models have larger brakes than the 94-96 years. Glenn
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
