Date: Sun, 02 Aug 1998 21:38:37 -0400 From: "Chris Thurrott" <scullynopsamltranet.com> Subject: Re: Volvo or Saab?
1994 was the first year for the "new" body style SAAB, not 1993. -Chris This message was sent by either: Chris Thurrott _or_ Kris D'Anci scully at ma dot ultranet dot com remove "nospam" from our e-mail address to send a reply ---------- In article <35c3dde4.0nopsam.iinc.com>, "eurohaus" <eurohausnopsam.com> wrote: >This may seem an unpopular choice, but, I would buy a 240 volvo over a 93 >SAAB, the SAAB is the "new" body style. If it were a fair contest, a 92 SAAB >vs. a 92 Volvo, I would pick the SAAB.... >providing its a 900..... >Before everyone condems me to being a Volvo sympathizer I currently own: 83 >900, 85 900T 4dr, 85 900T 3dr, 86 900T 3dr, 72 Sonett, 73 Sonett... >no Volvos at this time, >Bob St. Hilaire wrote in message ... >>Simple question? My wife and I are buying another car. Two models are >>in the running: Volvo and Saab. Given the cost, we are looking in the >>late model range of 1992 - 1993. Question is: Which car would you buy >>and why? >> >>Choices: >> >>1992 Volvo 240DL Wagon with 160,000 miles - Cherry - $9,500.00 >> >>1993 Saab 900S 3dr Full Luxury Package with 100,000 miles - major cherry >>- $9,500.00 >> >>If I were conviced this is a no-brainer I wouldn't bother posting. But >>Saabs seem to have a rather devious reputation of being somewhat >>unreliable. Volvo's, on the other hand, seem to just do their thing >>forever. >> >>Thanx for you input.... >> >>bob > >
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
