The banner above is an advertisment - if it asks you to download software, please ignore.
Site News - 3/26 M Car Covers (by State of Nine) | 12/12 Make Amazon Pay Saabnet!
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 1999 15:10:12 GMT
From: "Darren" <darrennopsamorp.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Comparison


> Each of the cars has its own appeal, but I'd go with the '95 over the '91. > Here's my two cents' worth: > > The '91 admittedly is a classic shape, although it's NOT a true SPG--more > likely it's one with the body panels... SPGs were not available in convertible > form, so it's likely rated at the 'standard' turbo power level. Spare parts > might be a tad more available, and some would argue that the early cars handle > better than the later ones (struts versus control arms up front). > > The 95 is quicker, the transmissions are MUCH sturdier, many of the systems are > better-designed and last longer (A/C is an example) the fit and finish of the > car is much better than the earlier ones, and there might be a slim chance of > having some warranty left on it. > > Paul > Michael I would go for the 91 any day. Having owned an '88 and a '95 I would SEVERELY dispute anything on the '95 will last longer or is fitted and finished better. I would also say don't even look at a '95 unless its got a cast iron warranty. Thats my 2c worth (or perhaps you'd like to hear about my $3,500 worth of repair bills so far for my '95 er!) Darren

Return to Main Index
StateOfNine.com
SaabClub.com
Jak Stoll Performance
M Car Covers
Ad Available

The content on this site may not be republished without permission. Copyright © 1988-2024 - The Saab Network - saabnet.com.
For usage guidelines, see the Mission & Privacy Notice.
[Contact | Site Map | Saabnet.com on Facebook | Saabnet.com on Twitter | Shop Amazon via TSN | Site Donations]