Date: 25 Apr 1999 20:40:54 GMT From: "Samuel Mikkola" <sampponopsami.fi> Subject: Re: Opinions on the 1999 Saab 9-3?
KBB <kentbassbutlernopsamo.com> kirjoitti artikkelissa <7fsk59$mt3$1nopsam3.Belgium.EU.net>... > > Johan LAUWERS <lauwers.sablonnopsam.be> a écrit dans le message : > 7fs3jb$5v2$1nopsam3.Belgium.EU.net... > > Again, we cannot use data, so let me give you a REAL LIVE EXAMPLE. > 3-My girlfriend was involved in an accident on a winding road in Southern > California : frontal collision with a 98 Toyota Camry : well she ended up in > the hospital with 2 broken legs and broken ribs and the driver of the Toyota > Camry came to rescue her because she couldn't get out the car . After > talking with the firefighters , they > brought up the fact that Saab don't perform particulary well in crashes > And believe me, they see a lot of crashes in LA...) > I'll get a Volvo any day !!!!!!!! At least the local crash inspector at the insurance company I use told me that Saabs are among the safest cars he's come across (and he doesn't drive a Saab himself). He's been doing that job for over 20 years, so he's come across quite many demolished cars and injured people. I myself would go for a pre -93 Classic 900. It's chassis is very simply but well put together, the car is safe and looks good :). Samuel http://www.multi.fi/~samppo/autot.htm Saab 99 Cabriolet -79 Saab 99E -71 (103 000km) Saab 99 GL -82 (222 000km) Saab 900i Special -87 (319 000km)
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
