Date: Sat, 25 Dec 1999 01:30:58 -0600 From: Mark Plumlee <turbospgnopsamsouth.net> Subject: Re: 9000CSE super car, but!!!!!
well it was based on it, but they did some chages to it, so it was "their" engine. on the old 99 engine, the spark plugs went in like V V but the changes to | | | | in the saab block. the head was way differnent in appearance. I guess you have a piont though... it WAS based on someone else's engine. I still think of the 2.0L a true saab engine . Mark Leroy Curtis wrote: > In article <3863B77A.9A16D6C6nopsamsouth.net>, Mark Plumlee > <turbospgnopsamsouth.net> writes > > > >Leroy Curtis wrote: > >> > >> That doesn't make it a bad car, of course. But here hasn't been a Saab > >> which was pure Saab since the last of the 2-stroke cars. > >> -- > >Leroy- are you forgetting about the 99 after 74 with the 2.0L swedish engine and > >the 900 series? those are pure saabs if any! > > Please correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't the 2.0 a heavy Saab redesign > of the original Triumph unit? > -- > Regards > > Leroy Curtis > > Please replace "nospam" with "baram" in my address if you wish to > reply by Email