Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2000 14:05:43 GMT From: jtmavnopsametway.com (JTMav) Subject: Re: Decisions, decisions...96 Aero, 98 CSE
On Sun, 09 Apr 2000 23:55:44 GMT, diamondlilnopsamnet wrote: The 98 does not have the same suspension as the Aero nor does it have the Aero seats, wheels or brakes. It's tough to choose here because they're both great cars. I have a 94 9000 CSE T as well as a 00 9-5 Aero. I guess if the Aero has been well cared for I would go with that. The stiffer suspension, the larger wheels and brakes and more capable in the twisties would sway me to the Aero. I think you win either way. Good luck. >I have the opportunity to choice btween the following; > >96 Aero, Black on Charcole w/36,000 miles 5 sp/ $21K USA >98 9000 CSE Red on Charcole w/11,000 miles 5 sp/ $23K USA > > >Assume both are excellent condition. I find little info on the 98 >CSE. Other than same engine (225 hp) I can't seem to find other >differences. The Aero is lower and stiffer sprung than it's 96 CSE >9000 counterpart and has 19 vs 18mm thicker sway bars as well as >thicker strut pistons. Does the 98 CSE follow suit? Any suggestions >are welcome. I'm torn. > >Todd JTMav Remove the NSP for email
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
