Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 21:03:51 +0200 From: Robert Brown <rjbnopsamnetNOSPAM.se> Subject: Re: More 900s clutch grief...sigh! (long, sorry)
Hi Time, These are good reasons that I did not consider. My apologies to all of you. Regards, Robert TimeRangernopsam.com wrote: > On Mon, 17 Apr 2000 09:02:16 +0200, Robert Brown > <rjbnopsamnetNOSPAM.se> wrote: > > >Hi Don, more opinions below: > > > > >I'll attach a picture from my workshop manual that shows what the sleeve looks like > >- though on a 1983 model (beware). Maybe another reader with a 1988 car can compare > >and tell us if the part is indeed different, and/or the clutch replacement kit was > >changed too. > > > >Now I'll get flamed for posting pictures in this NG but under the circumstances > >it's justified IMNSHO. > > > >Regards, > >Robert (see pic below) > > Please do NOT post binary files to non binary groups for some of the > following reasons: 1) Poor Usenet ettiquette. 2) Some News Servers > will automatically filter out binaries from non-binary groups. 3) > Some people do not have unlimited Internet access and do not want to > pay $ to download something they are not interested spending $ on. 4) > If too many binaries start showing up, some News Servers / ISPs will > drop the group from their line-up. 5) Some people have to pay for > local calls (mostly European) and do not want to spend the $. > > A question is better debated and left unanswered than a question that is answered without debate. > -Unknown > --
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
