Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 18:13:50 -0400 From: Todd Buttrick <diamondlilnopsamnet> Subject: Re: 97 900SE vs. 96' Aero?
Sean, Both the later 900s and 9000s seem to be equally reliable. 96 and up for the 9000s according to this newsgroup. The 900SETs tend to handle a bit better than the 9000s but the Aero comes pretty darn close. You can dress up an Aero or an CSE with after market wheels to get the look your after. I've had both and prefer the 9000s roominess and luxury to the 900. Either way you go, choose the model that has performance upgrades i.e. SE Turbo or Aero. The 98 9000CSE is an Aero under the skin with 225hp (5 spd.) Best of both worlds. Have a blast! Todd Buttrick 96 900SET 98 9000CSE Sean Corliss wrote: > If you had a choice, which one would you choose. and why? > > I'm torn, because I really like the '97 SE but have heard some not so > great stories of reliability in the 900 series. The 9000's tend to get > great reviews, however (even though they are not as nice looking). I > like Saab's, and I can't really see myself going Volvo, BMW, or Passat. > Anybody care to provide some suggestions? > Thanks! > > Sean > SCorlissnopsamress.com
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
