The banner above is an advertisment - if it asks you to download software, please ignore.
Site News - 3/26 M Car Covers (by State of Nine) | 12/12 Make Amazon Pay Saabnet!
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 01:30:30 GMT
From: John Higham <dahnopsam.net>
Subject: That GM difference?


Hello, I'm new here, so I hope my question has not already been debated to death prior to my finding this group. I'm considering purchasing a Saab and I'm wondering if owners think the GM models are better (in terms of reliability, handling, comfort) than the pre-GM models. Of course, I know that a used car can be a good or bad thing depending on the previous owner's attention to maintenance. But, all things being equal in that area, would you think a well-maintained used Saab from the pre-GM days is the same, better, or worse than one from the GM era (in regard to the three areas I mentioned)? And, against a new one? I ask because I've suffered at the hands of GM, experiencing the thrill of rust on a three month old truck only to be told by the dealer, "They all do that." The same vehicle experienced repeated ABS failure, water leaks, and body molding falling off. The dealer did fix everything (except the rust), but I traded it. I also have a friend who worked in the service department at a Saab dealership in the late 80's and she often told me that (then) new Saabs were frequent and repeat visitors for repair work. In the area I live, very few people own Saabs, so I haven't much to go on as far as asking them. There is a dealership 55 miles away, but they only carry the GM era cars (their used lot is filled with Mazdas and such). Your thoughts? Thanks. John

Return to Main Index
StateOfNine.com
SaabClub.com
Jak Stoll Performance
M Car Covers
Ad Available

The content on this site may not be republished without permission. Copyright © 1988-2024 - The Saab Network - saabnet.com.
For usage guidelines, see the Mission & Privacy Notice.
[Contact | Site Map | Saabnet.com on Facebook | Saabnet.com on Twitter | Shop Amazon via TSN | Site Donations]