Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 22:08:34 +0100 From: "Carl" <dontspam_cjpnopsamorld.com> Subject: Re: heavy clutch....
But surely the bulk of the cost is labour? -- To reply, remove "dontspam_" from return address. MBeest <MBeestnopsamathome16.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message news:3B265CF9.9880BA30nopsamathome16.freeserve.co.uk... > > > "s.king" wrote: > > > Hiya , I have a 900 turbo 16 that I'm selling to my cousin. The only > > reservation he has is that my car has a heavy clutch. It's fine for me, but > > he has a bad back and doesn't want to agrevate it. Will replacing the > > existing clutch solve this problem. I know its a bity on the heavy side but > > some cars have clutches that need hardly any pressure to work. > > > > what would you suggest? > > > > many thanks in advance for your reply, > > > > Simon > > > > s.kingnopsameonline.net > > Hi, I had a similar thing with a 1990 900 turbo 16s, and the replaced just > the clutch release bearing which helped. It's still not feather light to > depress > the clutch, but it is considerably better than it was before they replaced > the bearing. > > It's also considerably less than a new clutch assembly. > > MB. > > >
