Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2001 12:39:35 GMT
From: "KeithG" <noonenopsaml.com>
Subject: Re: Help me decide!  900S Hatchback vs. 900SE Convertible


It is heavier and affects the handling as well. It is thirstier. It is a GM motor (as opposed to Saab motor). Are you sure that it is 100UKP? I have heard that it is a bit more difficult than that, though I have never priced it. KeithG "Baz" <baznopsamn.co.uk> wrote in message news:kbneptgnenrr92pgps4j9919pop2f2akvjnopsamcom... > On Wed, 05 Sep 2001 18:17:20 -0400, Four Weis <mweinopsamcom> wrote: > > > > > > >Janet & Ian Murray wrote: > > > >> 1997 S has 39,000 miles, 1995 SE has 75,000 miles. Similarly priced and > >> optioned (except SE-only stuff). In similar condition, Blue Book rates the > >> SE a better buy by $2500 US. > >> > >> Your choice? > >> > >> Any opinions on the SE's V6 versus the S's I4 (I commute 500 miles/week). > > > >Unless things have changed I would avoid V6 and stick with 4 cylinder. > > I hear alot about avoiding the V6, but as yet no-one has given > any reason why ? It needs it's timing belt changed every 30,000 miles > seems to be the only complaint, but it's hardly a problem, it costs > about 100 UKP ? > > Regards > Jay >

Return to Main Index

The content on this site may not be republished without permission. Copyright © 1988-2018 - The Saab Network - saabnet.com.
For usage guidelines, see the Saabnet.com Mission and Purpose Page.
[Contact | Site Map | Saabnet.com on Facebook | Saabnet.com on Twitter | Shop Amazon via TSN | Site Donations]