Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2001 06:47:05 -1000 From: "Michael Baker" <bakernopsam.net> Subject: Re: Toyota in top five again (JD Power....)
These i think have to be taken with a grain of salt. I remember looking at i believe a consumer reports issue on cars in the late 80s saying volvos were good, which they are by and large, but oi, expensive to maintain. <ziggynopsamplace.invalid> wrote in message news:q5bhststd6nit2ke3jfk9uh90h757tc9dlnopsamcom... > On Mon, 1 Oct 2001 21:54:51 -0400, "Derek Hawkins" <eldatanopsamcom> > wrote: > > >:)"For the sixth straight year, the luxury brand of Toyota leads the list of > >:)most-dependable, four- and five-year-old vehicles, according to automotive > >:)researcher J.D. Power and Associates of Agoura Hills, California." > > Yaaaaa, Toyota! > > > >:) > >:)"Ranking second is Porsche, followed by Nissan's luxury brand, Infiniti." > >:) > >:)"The highest-rated non-luxury brand is Toyota, which takes fourth spot in > >:)the annual Power Vehicle Dependability Study." > >:) > >:)"Listed as below average in long-term dependability are, in alphabetical > >:)order: Chevrolet, Chrysler, Dodge, Eagle, GMC, Hyundai, Isuzu, Jeep, Kia, > >:)Land Rover, Mitsubishi, Plymouth, Pontiac, Saab, Suzuki, Volvo and > >:)Volkswagen. Power does not publicly release the below-average rankings." > >:) > >:) > >:) >
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
