Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 12:03:50 GMT From: "F Wills" <Fred.Willsnopsamam.starband.net> Subject: Re: 95 saab conv.-- good deal?
Completely different car. 94 = classic 95 = NG. "itten" <ittennopsam.com> wrote in message news:211020012059075679%ittennopsam.com... > I bought a '94 900 Turbo Conv. last January for $11k with 54k miles in > excellent condition. A real good car and deal. > > > > > > In article <20011021135343.18442.00000433nopsamf.aol.com>, Susanmarine > <susanmarinenopsamcom> wrote: > > > Hi saab fans, > > > > I am about to bid on a '95 900 S convertible in excellent condition (inside > > and out), but I am a little unsure about the value I am getting. Please weigh > > in. > > > > the car is > > auto transmission, 4 cyl > > 100K miles, > > no obvious mechanical issues (had my brother in law mechanic give it a full > > inspection). > > no rust or other obvious body wear. > > basic stereo w.cassette > > > > > > the owner wants 11K. she's a friend of mine, so I'm not inclined to bargain, > > unless I have a sense that it's excessive. book value on Kelly is 12,300, but > > on Black Book is 9800! there's another whole topic of debate...one book > > listing > > vs. another. I've seen these cars on various auction sites go for as little as > > 9500 with lower mileage. > > > > anyway, if you have thoughts about this deal, please share, along with > > rationale. > > > > susan
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
