Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 01:42:47 GMT From: "Harry Davis" <harryedavisnopsamediaone.net> Subject: Re: Differences between an 9000 2.3 Turbo and 900 Aero
"F Wills" <Fred.Willsnopsamam.starband.net> wrote in message news:IUWI7.5603$2l4.1082179732nopsamter1.starband.net... > > "Goran Larsson" <hohnopsamlid.invalid> wrote in message > news:GMH0M0.EMynopsamove.se... > > In article <MriG7.6750$MI.3471825nopsamoon.ne.mediaone.net>, > > Harry Davis <harryedavisnopsamediaone.net> wrote: > > > > > I don't think the 900 Aero was imported to the US. The only place I > have > > > ever heard of them is in Europe. > > > > They were imported, but for some reason the US market didn't use the Aero > > name. Instead the Aero received the rather silly name 900 SPG (Special > > Performance Group). > > > > The statement was that there were no such thing as an 900 Aero. The truth > > is that this newsgroup isn't limited to the US the 900 Aero does exist. > > > > -- > > G–ran Larsson Senior Systems Analyst hoh AT approve DOT se > > Yes, sorry. Those cars are known as SPG's here and I have never heard of > them being called Aero. At least with the 9000's there is a badge on the > rear that helps me recognize them <g> > But I don't think the SPG (900 Aero?) made that much horsepower. I think > it was only around 185 also but I could be wrong... > > I believe the 900 Aero was NG900. The 900SPG was a classic 900.