Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 11:10:25 +0000 (UTC) From: nospam.drwrighnopsamlobal.net (Derek Wright) Subject: Re: 9-3 or 9-5............
I have a 96 900 Turbo and a 9-5 estate auto with a chipped engine The 900 is like a motorbike compared to the 9-5 The 9-5 is so effortless to drive, the 900 very noisy and hard If all your driving is fun driving - ie round the lanes on a Summer day then go 9-3, if it is A to B driving go 9-5 - you will will be able to cover more miles a day in a 9-5 than a 9-3 because it is less fatiguing. But get the 9-5 chipped unless you go for a high power variant On Tue, 8 Jan 2002 08:34:11, "Iain McWilliams" <iainnopsamco.uk> wrote: > > "H." <musicboxnopsamrider.co.uk> wrote in message > news:76qj3u85rvo4lrmk28m2vjbh1gl7mbi20snopsamcom... > > Guys, as ever, I turn to you for opinions and advice! > > > > I am in a complete quandary over what to buy next! Yes, I know, it > > sounds silly, but there you go. > > > > Basically, my two options are 2002 9-5 2.0lpt Vector saloon, or a 2002 > > 9-3 Aero 5-dr. My partner wants me to get the the 9-5 (after much > > persuading that NO I did not want A Freelander, and NO I definitely > > did not want a sodding Toyota Rav4!) However, I still have a hankering > > for the 9-3 Aero. > > > ..... > > > > Any thoughts, comments opinions valued, just don't tell me I'm a > > complete idiot! > > I had a 900 then switched to a 9-5 Estate, when it was time to change I > looked at a sporty 9-3 or the 9-5 Estate. After test driving the two it was > no contest the 9-5 won on everything bar raw power. > > Test drive the two, but I bet you go for the 9-5. > > Regards, > Iain > > -- Derek Wright drwrighnopsamlobal.net In the UK
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
