Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 10:44:50 -0500 From: "EricL" <elaw-NO-SPAM-nopsamsinc.com> Subject: Re: 9000 vs. 9-5
Johannes, You're missing my point. No argument the 9000 has *way* more cargo space with the rear seats folded down. But with the seats *up*, I think the 9-5's got a bit more. Too bad they don't make a 5-door 9-5 Aero - I'd buy it in a heartbeat! Eric "Johannes H Andersen" <johsnopsamanytime.co.uk> wrote in message news:3C7CF0CC.F815481Fnopsamanytime.co.uk... > > > EricL wrote: > > > > A little longer, but you'd hardly notice. I've got my '97 Aero, the wife's > > '99 9-5, and my old '86 9KT in the driveway. The 9-5's "trunk" (comparing > > to the hatchbacks w/seats up and parcel shelf in place) seems larger - > > 20-30% maybe?. > > > > Not that the 9000's cargo space is exactly small! It's all I can do to keep > > from laughing when I look at the trunk on my brother's Corolla. But that's > > ok, his car gets 32 MPG and mine only gets 30 :^) > > > > Eric Law > > I fit my mountain bike into my 9k CSE, no problem. How about your 9-5? > > Johannes
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
