Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2002 22:29:06 GMT From: Bob <uctraingNOSPAMnopsamanet.com> Subject: Re: New "used" 93 puchase
On Mon, 04 Mar 2002 20:05:30 -0500, Kalman Rubinson <kr4nopsamedu> wrote: >I had a '96 900SE and a '99 9-3SE (both on 3 year leases) and I >definitely suggest the 9-3. The suspension improvements alone justify >it. For the difference in $'s you could put some money into the 900 suspension and have a car better than either is stock. I'd go for the '98 NG900, as it is the last model in a mature series where all the problems had already been worked out. The '99 9-3 is the same car, with 1000 (claimed) new parts. New parts are always subject to new failures. > The only downside to my particular 9-3 is that HUGE remote fob >for the key. I think the updated "key with fob" can be programmed for a '99 9-3 to eliminate the elephant fob. I know that the NG900 can't. Bob
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
