Someone who looks an awful lot like seelifenopsampark wrote:
> davehinznopsamcop.net wrote:
>>Fits every accepted definition of Usenet spam.
> So are off-topic responses like yours. And this one.
Well, you may be perfectly content to let Usenet descend into a
spam-zone, but I am not. Also, if you think that *this* and *your*
message are spam as well, you really need to go learn what spam is
about, why it's a problem, and what the definition is.
> BTW, it may be commercial, but a lot of folks try to hawk their personal stuff here.
Looked like a business to me, not some guy selling his own old wheels or
car. See the distinction?
> It's only one posting. Much like our friend who made only one post.
So, if every spammer posts just one post ... no thanks, I don't like
your concept of Usenet. Sounds too much like my email in-box.
> Jeez...give him break.
I did; I just bashed him publically, rather than reporting him to his
ISP and collecting the "Thanks, we've whacked him" message like I usually
do.
Thanks for sharing your opinion; I'll give it all the consideration
it is due. And I mean that.
Dave Hinz