Date: 17 Sep 2002 00:45:55 -0700 From: emulganopsamo.fr (llooping) Subject: Re: Saab 93 2.0t GPL
"Mark Gerritsma" <magernopsam.nld> wrote in message news:<pwGg9.47287$H6.4392261nopsaml1.home.nl>... > "Johannes H Andersen" <johsnopsamanytime.co.uk> schreef in bericht > news:3D82F050.FC9C3F87nopsamanytime.co.uk > >> Hello, i looking for a power kit for a Saab 93 2.0t LPG for > increase > >> the power of the car only in fuel, not in LPG of course. > >> > >> If you have any information about it, i'm interested ! > > > > Seems quite complicated to two states of tune in one and the same > > engine? > > At least in theory it isn't. Your state of tuning is just a bunch of > numbers in a chip. If you program two sets of numbers and tell the CPU > to look at a different memory location if a switch as been flipped > you're basically there. > I can say for certain it exists for the diesel: > http://www.wetterauer.nl/specificaties/saab/Saab9322TiD.html (in > dutch). For the petrol engines I am not sure; I haven't tried finding > one yet. > > > AFAIK, LPG mode runs hotter and is therefore not very > > suitable for tuning. > > It is indeed a fact that LPG runs hotter, but I have good hopes the > use of liquid LPG injection instead of an evaporator, will increase > suitability. The liquid LPG injected directly into the intake manifold > evaporates there lowering the temperature of the mixture in the intake > manifold. Also something like sodium-core exhaust valves could help > (if it doesn't have that already), because the most common problem is > burnt exhaust valves. > Even if might not be possible to reach the 210+ hp some tuners claim > while on petrol, 180 hp to 190 hp should be possible. If only because > I have already seen a 2.0T (185hp) on LPG offered in a garage. Not a > word about it's reliability though. Ok, so it's possible to do it ! It's exacty that i would like to do, make in petrol 185 HP and Normal power in LPG, but i can't find a web site for a kit about this. If you have any information about this and in France will be better. Thanks.
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
