Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 22:48:20 +0200 From: "Delporte Marc" <marc.delportenopsamdoo.fr> Subject: Re: TURBO or turbo?
Hi I've got in the past : :+(( 900i (i.e. 135 HP) :+) 900 Turbo 16 S (probably Vigent or NG in US) :+) "old 9000 2.0 Turbo" (i.e. 185 HP) ... but getting older (40 only however !) but with more children (3!) in the car (at least only the WE !) ... I'm now with a 9000 (98) 2.3 TURBO i.e. 200 HP :+)) As expressed in previous posts, which turbo are you talking about ? For the 9000, to resume : (from a previous post that helps me really a lot ! thanks to his author! to choose between an low pressure turbo i.e. 170 HP or "THE REAL TURBO" High pressure i.e. 200 HP) : ... even if the 2.3 t (170 HP) is not slough ... ... 2.3 T (i.e. 200 HP) is just flying !!! By experience (now) on both cars, I can confirm that clever statement ! I'm not going to purchase an 9.5 even with a nice design but really to small for me ! ... and I do not need an Estate (even Aero i.e. 250 HP !) as I do not have to fit in my car a dog ! Best Regards Marc ******************* "SimonJ" <Menopsam.net> a Ècrit dans le message de news: aohm40$n3h$1nopsams.btinternet.com... > How can you tell if a saab is an ecopower turbo, or a 'proper' turbo? > > I have allways had 9000's and 900's, all turbos. At least with those you > know you are getting the real deal, if its a turbo its a turbo. > The newer models all have turbo's, so you cant tell from the adverts what > you are buying! If you see what I mean. > > I may be going to buy 9-5 next, or should I stick to a 9000? > > Should never have gotten rid or the Carlsson! :( > I'm having to drive around in a Ford Mondullo at the moment, punishment or > what! > >
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
