Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 19:02:12 -0000 From: Skodapilot <carl.robsonnopsamcing-czechs.com> Subject: Re: Worst SAAB story?
In article <arb3bh$gscni$2nopsam34476.news.dfncis.de>, davehinznopsamcop.net spouted forth into alt.autos.saab... > That's the same thing they told me when my third-gear cluster blew > into chunks in my 900, at about 80,000 miles and *way* out of warranty. > I wonder what gets into these guys, that they think they can just go > fixing things and not charging, just because it shouldn't have broken. > > Contrast: my wife's Dodge minivan; tranny took a dump 3000 out of warranty, > and Chrysler's official response was "Well, that's just too bad. You should > have bought the extended warranty." > > That is the difference between car manufacturers. Rolls Royce had a similar thing. Engines were tagged and sealed when new, so you couldn't tamper, but even now, if an older roller goes to a dealer, as long as there isn't any sign of obviouse abuse, they will put it right and not charge, then deny there was a fault, because Rollers are perfect, and Rollers stay perfect. And Rollers don't break down. -- Carl Robson http://www.bouncing-czechs.com
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
