Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 23:22:49 -0000 From: "jj" <chnopsamail.com> Subject: Re: 900i advise...
"Paul Halliday" <pjghnopsamyonder.co.uk> wrote in message news:BA8D7D82.4204%pjghnopsamyonder.co.uk... > in article MPG.18d1dbf610090a2c989859nopsam.cis.dfn.de, MeatballTurbo at > carl.robsonnopsamcing-czechs.com wrote on 06/03/2003 22:28: > What would be the downside? A failed rack in 10,000 miles? Purists may say > different, but I don't think it matters - not on an old Swedish Brick > anyway. I'll stick with Castrol TQ-F - my racks haven't failed yet :) The rack is pure saginaw GM, identical to the racks used in 80's US J body cars... I'm pretty sure any PAS fluid/ATF compatible with GM specs would be OK. Early racks went to lunch no matter what you put in them every 80-100K, the 90> racks were much better.
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
