Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 08:47:43 GMT From: "Mark Plumlee" <turbospgnopsamsouth.net> Subject: Re: Switching to DI
all DI means is Direct ignition, in other owrds no dist. apc controls boost, a must on turbo cars Trionic is something u dont need, its for 2.3 L cars "Fred W." <Fred.Willsnopsamammyrealbox.com> wrote in message news:LAFea.973$TW2.470806nopsam1.news.adelphia.net... > > "Goran Larsson" <hohnopsamlid.invalid> wrote in message > news:HC3ptu.DK3nopsamove.se... > > In article <ykEea.938$TW2.442426nopsam1.news.adelphia.net>, > > Fred W. <Fred.Willsnopsamammyrealbox.com> wrote: > > > > > > Early DI cars (in 1988, called DI/APC) used a control box combining > > > > whatever was needed to drive the DI and to perform the APC functions. > > > > The fuel ECU was the same as for pre DI cars. > > > > > Correct, assuming that we are talking about a turbo engine. Otherwise > what > > > would you need and APC for? > > > > What else would I be talking about? Only turbo engines (and not even all > > of them) did have DI in 1988. > > Maybe in 88, but later years NA engines had DI but no APC (prior to Trionic > in '93), right? > >
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
