Date: 17 Apr 2003 17:48:00 GMT From: davehinznopsamcop.net Subject: Re: SAAB IS OVER
Someone who looks an awful lot like wysiwyg.docnopsamspring.com wrote: > love the turmoil Ah, so you're just a troll then. (in the Usenet sense, not the Nordic sense). > all my saabs are or have been YS3 numbers Your shift and punctuation keys seem to be defective. You should get that looked at. > GM wasn't in the picture when mine were produced So? > finland did produce saabs under tight controls from the swedes Yes, it's called a set of specifications, one should think. Does this amount to a retraction, or is it merely a backpedal? > by the time the GM vintage cars come of age i'll have collected enough > vintage swedish built cars to drive them the rest of my life. OK. > in my opinion it won't take long for the GM quality to ruin a good > thing. Yes, people have been saying this for a decade or so now. Can you define 'not long' in this context please? > i have never know any GM product to get 372k miles on an engine Does the engine suddenly become a GM one just because of a change of the board of directors? Does my 2.3L-4 know that the parent company of the manufacturer is someone different now? > by the way i sold that one (85-900S) to a kid who drove her away with > 372k and i saw her the other day and the same kid was still behind the > wheel 3 years later.... OK, > i have owned chevrolets and oldsmobiles both were high maintenance > items. OK, > engine problems and transmission problems were thier downfall. > i've even owned a mecedes but it was to stuffy and rode like a buckboard > well so much for a substantiated opinion > i'm sold on the real saab made by swedes So, are the Saabs built by Finns or Belgians "real Saabs", or not?