Date: 2 Jul 2003 12:27:00 GMT From: davehinznopsamcop.net Subject: Re: Investigation of 1sourceautowarranty.com
In alt.autos.saab sbright <sbrightnopsamail.com> wrote: > I got ripped on their coverage as well. It seems that they're tied in with > Ebay pretty close. Please define "tied with". Oh, and tell me you didn't do business with a spammer in the first place. > They turned down coverage to replace the crankshaft pulley. It has a rubber > part and therefore is a > wear and tear item. Was that in the contract you signed? (you did _read_ it first, right?) > The car had +/- 40,0000 at the time. The dealer > doesn't even want to deal with > them, I have to use the Shell gas station if I even want an attempt made to > get coverage. Did you ask the dealer, before you signed the contract, if they would work with them? > Also, you have > to call and advise them of the pending repair, and then the mechanic has to > call and get the authorization. Did you know any of this before you signed? Should you have? > I haven't ever been past that point, but I'm sure they have a few more > hoops. I'm never buying an > extended warranty through 1st Source Auto warranty.com again. Maybe a few > more posts like this > will cost them a customer or two. Of course if they see this post, and want > to return my $1100, I'll say something > nice about them. I doubt that would ever happen though. The lawyer guy > should persue this angle as well. If you signed up for it without understanding what it was about, you deserve nothing more than a smack upside the head. If you bought it as a result of a spam post in a usenet group, you deserve a kick in the pants. I'm not saying that what they (may or may not) do is right, by any means, but that if people would use their heads when signing up for something that costs real money, then people who abuse consumers would have fewer victims.
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
