Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 05:33:25 GMT From: N Williamson <Spudman27nopsamcom.invalid> Subject: Re: 9-5 2000 Reliability
In article <273e16cf.0310150926.658d4c84nopsaming.google.com>, frederic.tremblaynopsaminal.com (Frederic Tremblay) wrote: > 9-5 2000 Reliability > > Hi, > i am looking for buying a 9-5 SE 2000 or 9-5 2000 with 60 000 km. > They are the same price. Witch engine is the best? The V6 or I4. > What is the reliability of these cars? > > Thanks! I've had a '94 900 with the V6 since new. Wished I had the i4 only due to the maint cost. Nice motor, but damn if a timing belt every 30,000 miles doesn't get a bit pricey. 151K miles on it now. NWW -- Why is it all the sensors seeking intelligent life are pointed away from earth?