Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 10:39:05 +0000 From: Martin Rich <M.G.Richnopsam.ac.uk> Subject: Re: 900 vs 9-3.
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 03:21:32 GMT, "pablo" <pablo.at.simplynopsamre.dot.net> wrote: > >It was a facelift, but a comprehensive and extensive one. I'd heck into the >background of both cars, but unless the newer one has been involved in a >crash or has something odd in its history, I'd most certainly go with the >newer 9-3. It's a no brainer in that case, really. > ... also not purely a cosmetic facelift: the 9-3 should handle better and would protect you a bit better in the event of a crash. Drive both cars: you may feel that the better handling of the 9-3 is worth the extra money Martin