Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 03:44:54 GMT From: amesnospamrak.demon.co.uk (Andrew Stephenson) Subject: Re: 9-3 2003-2005 Safety Rating - Double Pick
In article <1103395777snznospamrak.demon.co.uk> amesnospamrak.demon.co.uk "Andrew Stephenson" writes: > In article <41C45D41.2000701nospamo.com> ma_twainnospamo.com > "ma_twain" writes: > > > [...] Yes, the car won the highest crash test rating, but it > > failed to save money. Which do you think is more important to > > the execs and accountants? > > With GM being the proud recipient of that record damages award -- > 15 gigabucks in 1999, was it? -- GM's brass should be handing out > bouquets to the Saab-versives. Hmm, maybe that should have read... With GM being the losing defendant in that record damages case -- 15 gigabucks in 1999, was it? -- GM's brass should be handing out bouquets to the Saab-versives. -- Andrew Stephenson
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
