Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 00:19:00 GMT From: Retro-Bob <uctraingSPAM-ME-NEVERnospamanet.com> Subject: Re: 9-3 vs. 900?
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 19:06:35 -0500, "BL" <brianlevernospamatico.ca> wrote: >> >The one consideration that I would have is that transmission/clutch issues >were resolved with the introduction of the hydraulic clutch on the '98 NG900 >( earlier NG900's had a cable clutch which were problematic). In addition, >the cabin heating/cooling system was improved with later model NG 900..I >think this also happened with the '98 model year but not sure on that. The clutch cable issues are overrated. If you replace the cable every 45K (cheap job) you will never have issues. It is a little stiffer, particularly compared to Japanese clutches. (If it's a _lot_ stiffer, the car has problems). I own a '97 SE and I love it - but given the choice, I'd buy the car with lower miles.
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
