Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 09:55:41 +0100 From: Grunff <grunffnospam.com> Subject: Re: Newbie
Brian Collins wrote: Hi Brian, > - What years are considered "classic 900"? 1979-1993 > - What advantages if any exist in the other years outside the "classic" > range I'll pass on that one - I have very few good things to say about NG900s (New Generation, 1994-1997). > - any big bad problems noted with the 1997 model? (I have a lead on one > for sale) Well, they're better than the 1994 models ;-) These cars are totally different from your 1985 C900 - they are based on a GM platform, and are considered by many to be the worst cars Saab has ever produced. But some people like them. > - Auto transmission good/bad reliability? In NG900s? Not bad. > - Any place I can get answers to things like this without pestering > folks here? There are lots of sites with Saab info out there. If you're looking for straightforward model data, then: <http://www.saabmuseum.com/> -- Grunff
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
