Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 21:35:29 GMT From: "Nasty Bob" <nospamspeedypancakenospamail.com> Subject: Re: SID - again
"Malt_Hound" <""Malt_Hound\"nospamm-me not*yahoo.com"> wrote in message news:TIydnVUBtLqWVN_eRVn-pwnospamphia.com... > Colin Stamp wrote: > > On Tue, 04 Oct 2005 02:01:26 GMT, "Molly B Denum" <mollyb3543nospamcom> > > wrote: > > > > [snip] > > > >>One more thing that irks me about Saabs: the radio and speakers in my 2002 > >>9-5 sound horrible and I think that Saab is screwing all those of us who > >>don't like the crappy sound of this radio by monopolizing our freedom of > >>choice and making it near impossible for us to replace this piece of shit > >>with a decent head unit. Whose stupid idea was it to "marry" the radio to > >>the car? Isn't this sort of a shotgun wedding? Just plain stupid > >> > > > > > > I'm pretty sure it's the stereo that needs the car rather than the > > other way around. The car will still work perfectly happily without > > the stereo, so there's nothing to stop you taking out the original > > stereo so your still-married car can have a bit of a fling with a > > floozy of an aftermarket head-unit. > > > > Oh the horror of it... promiscuous audio in a SAAB? > Undoubtedly this is further evidence of the GM influence. > -Fred W I agree. You start by experimenting with head units, speakers and amps. And before you know it, you're playing with high performance exhausts, engine management systems and locking yourself in the bathroom with alloy wheel catalogues... GM have ruined Saab's fine reputation. No wonder they've become the car of choice for swingers...
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
