Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 00:07:32 GMT From: nospamnospame.rr.com (Kevin Rhodes) Subject: Re: 2001 95 V6 Wagon beware
In article <M6qdnXTtF4eFB1PeRVn-iQnospamphia.com>, Malt_Houndnospamm-me-not*yahoo.com wrote: >Should I wrote: >> Thanks Fred. Why's that? Also mileage is actually 118K... >> > >The better engine is the turbocharged I4. Better mileage, better power, >lighter, better engine performance all around. > The V6 has rather more power than the lpt4, though not as much as the Aero. Of course it does not attract Aero insurance premiums either. And does not suffer from the turbo lag inherent in the Aero, so I would say it is faster at around town speeds if the Aero is an automatic especially. The V6 is FAR smoother and quieter than the 4, gets only a couple MPG lower (Official EPA difference is *1* MPG), and is mostly immune from sludge issues. And the V6 was generally a better equipped car, though I realise there were 4cyl SEs in '99. Kevin Rhodes
