Date: 23 Mar 2006 17:13:36 GMT From: Dave Hinz <DaveHinznospamcop.net> Subject: Re: 2001 9-5 V6 3.0L - a good buy with GM engine?
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 17:07:39 GMT, Johannes Andersen <johsnospamfitter.com> wrote: > > SmaartAasSaabr wrote: >> There is no denial that the four-cylinder 9-5's are suffering from many >> engine failures as a result of oil sludging, from overly infrequent oil >> changes, low quality oil and a crap PCV system, as well as a faulty >> batch of turbochargers on the initial LPT 4-cyl cars. From a strict >> reliability point of vue, the V6 "GM" engine is light years better. And >> that engine is a Saab specific item anyway with an assymetrical >> turbocharger, only one on the road with that kind of setup. Sure you >> have to change the timing belt every 100 000 km like any other timing >> belt car... > You're a troll, yes? He might be, but I don't see anything glaringly factually wrong in the above. ???
