Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2006 02:51:55 GMT From: Bob <uctraingnospamanet.com> Subject: Re: Well, the convertible is on Ebay now.
On 29 Mar 2006 20:06:56 GMT, Dave Hinz <DaveHinznospamcop.net> wrote: > >> It can be if they want it to be and can find Constitutional >> "cover" for it. > >That's great. Let's set precident that the SCOTUS can just ignore >distinctions if they feel like it. Sorry, no. Even though I disagree >with the non-ruling, I wholeheartedly agree that it was the right way to >(not) rule. On the mark Dave. We get all sorts of people who want to bend the rules when it's "right" to bend them in their interpretation. The rules need to be hard and fast. Any erosion just leads to more erosion. Too many people have lost sight of, or never had any understanding of, the founding principles of this country. The unwashed masses continue to give away their rights in the name of "good" and fail to stand up when their rights are taken in the same vein by those who tell stories. Oh that the Founding Fathers could be brought back to lecture.
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
