 |
|
|
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 09:52:05 -0400 From: Fred W <Malt_Houndnospamm-me-not*yahoo.com> Subject: Re: 9000 CS vs. Aero...what's the difference?
Richard Sutherland-Smith wrote: > In message <1154977143.000640.237610nospam2000cwa.googlegroups.com> > "Nasty Bob" <speedypancakenospamail.com> wrote: > > >>Jon - sounds like you know your way round a car better than me :) >> >> >> >>>>>Should I shoot for the automatic Aero? >>>> >>>>NO! >> >>>Why?! Except for the fact that it's an automatic... Remember, the car >>>with all the issues is a black, 5-speed CS. The Aero was one I found >>>previously, from a dealer who isn't very interested in returning phone >>>calls. >> >>Just personal opinion. I understand that autos are more common over >>there, but the performance available from a stock Aero is exceptional & >>I just feel you need a stick shift to get the most out of it. >> >>Whatever you decide to do - good luck and I hope you find your car :) >> > > Autos only had 200bhp compared to the manual's 225! > Easily corrected with a change in firmware. -- -Fred W
