*sigh*
It IS noticable from just looking at the car from behind.
I guess I'll have to take it to the local repair shop and get their
insight (and estimate CO$T). ARGH!!!
Thank you Jim.
Jim M wrote:
> <don.schencknospaml.com> wrote in message
> news:1158619720.547572.307590nospam000cwe.googlegroups.com...
> > My '94 900S has rear wheels that are not verticle. In fact, the tires
> > are worn down the the steel on the inside and the outside edges are
> > almost like-new.
> >
> > Is this a common problem?
> >
> > Please tell me that it typically is an adjustment.
> >
> > Please help; I'm ready to fix up this beater (engine is still great!)
> > and drive it another two years (and sell my 2000 MR2 Spyder).
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > -- Don in York, PA
> >
>
> What you're describing is negative camber. The car is designed to have -1=
.4=B0
> to -2.0=B0 camber, which should be barely noticable if you're looking str=
aight
> on at the rear of the car. This car has a semi-ridgid rear axle, therefor=
e,
> AFIK, there are no adjustments. If you're camber is truly off, I would th=
ink
> you have a bent axle.