Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 19:41:51 -0000 From: "DervMan" <thedervmannospaml.com> Subject: Re: Lifetime of Saab
"Elder" <carl.robsonnospamcing-czechs.com> wrote in message news:MPG.1fcea6fee735be84c61nospam.individual.net... > In article <456347e2$0$18058$fa0fcedbnospam.zen.co.uk>, > thedervmannospaml.com says... >>"Elder" <carl.robsonnospamcing-czechs.com> wrote in message >>news:MPG.1fccf327b2752f63c47nospam.individual.net... >>> In article <ejqhdg$gr7$2nospamoron.nerim.net>, farrisnospam.org says... >>>>Why should I not "lump everyone's design together" when that's exactly >>>>what GM >>>>(the manufacturer of SAAB) has been doing since 1994? >>>> >>> Because this car does not belong in the post 94 GM world of one lump >>> fits all. >> >> >>The later the Saab, the more generic - but that's not to say there are not >>still different and unique features in '94 onwards Saabs. >> > Oh true. Very true. > Infact, one of the possible options to replae the octie come change time > is a GM Saab, although I might be tempted by a late 9000 2.3 FPT. A good choice. I've always liked certain Saab features, specifically the dashboard and interior comfort. -- The DervMan www.dervman.com
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
