Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 21:48:04 +0000 From: turtillnospamail.com Subject: Re: Ping Peter T
On Tue, 21 Nov 2006 11:37:10 GMT, "Swampy Bogtrotter" <samandjanetknoxnospamco.net> wrote: >GrumpyOne wrote: >> <turtillnospamail.com> wrote in message >> news:ogq4m2tbp8qkgstsjk7sa68r2529bt9meanospamcom... >>> On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 22:57:51 GMT, "Pat P" >>> <eaxstitchNOSPAMnospamorld.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I`ve no doubt he`ll be back with some outlandish sob-story. >>> >>> I visit this ng every day you stupid old biddy. I am just a bit busy >>> atm with legal matters. >>> pete >> >> How remiss of me to forget; of course you are suing a bloke who >> posted a link to a web page. A web page that appeared to everyone >> else, to be a truthful précis of your character. > >Hang on a minute. Am I missing something here? > >He's sueing someone for posting a link to a website? >Is this a website on the open internet? >A website that anybody with an internet connection and the ability to use >google could have found? > >So basically, he's sueing someone for making public some information that >was already public to begin with? > >I fail to see what crime has been commited, or how he has been injured, >either physically or emotionally. > >> This should be one Court case worth watching out for. ROFL > >I agree. > -- http://www.brazierbridgewood.blogspot.com/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/ipswich/
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
