Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 21:46:50 +0000 From: turtillnospamail.com Subject: Re: Libellous Link?
On Tue, 21 Nov 2006 18:02:23 GMT, "Swampy Bogtrotter" <samandjanetknoxnospamco.net> wrote: >I found this over in UK.Legal. >Looks like Turtil is upset about people posting links to websites. >I wonder if its this one http://www.ureader.co.uk/message/1942198.aspx ? > >Joe Soap wrote: >> Over a year ago someone made a "FAQ" concerning myself and put it on >> some web sites. I have posted the administrators of two of the sites >> and complained - one of the sites has removed the FAQ; but the other >> refuses to do so despite the fact that the material on the site is >> clearly libelous about me. >> >> I know who done the original faq but cannot prove it. >> >> Now other people are referring to it on some newsgroups. One >> particular individual has clearly drawn it to the attention of >> everyone by saying here is a page about "Joe Soap" and then the link >> to the web-page. >> >> He has obviously indirectly labeled me by drawing the site to the >> attention of other people - which has caused me a lot of distress. I >> am have started legal action against him - what do you think my >> chances of winning are (I'm not very well off but can raise the money >> to start an action) > > -- http://www.brazierbridgewood.blogspot.com/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/ipswich/
