Date: 25 Jan 2007 20:23:08 GMT From: MI5Victimnospamgov.uk Subject: MI5 Persecution: BBC's Hidden Shame 4/5/95 (763)
Date: Thu May 4 18:27:24 1995 Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy Subject: BBC's Hidden Shame Remember the two-way televisions in George Orwell's 1984? The ones which watched you back? Which you could never get rid of, only the sound could be turned down? Well the country which brought Orwell into the world has made his nightmare follow into the world after him. Since 1990 the British have been waging war against one of their own citizens using surveillance to invade privacy and a campaign of abuse in the transmitted media in their efforts to humiliate their "victim". And the most remarkable thing about it is that what they do is not even illegal - the UK has no laws to protect the privacy of its citizens, nor does it proscribe harassment or abuse except in the case of racial abuse. A lot of people in England know this to be going on, yet so far they have maintained perfect "omerta"; not a sound, not a squeak has escaped into the English press, and for all the covert harassment absolutely nothing has come out into the public domain. Have the British gone mad? I think we should be told. ------------------------------- From: "Mr.B" <dgb01nospam.ac.uk> Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy Subject: Re: BBC's Hidden Shame Date: Mon May 8 05:32:13 1995 Mmmm. Who, exactly is this victim you're talking about? First up, Britain or the UK (not 'England' - England is a part of Britain, like Kansas is a part of the USA) does have laws that protect the individual from harassement - you can't just threaten people willy nilly. There are laws against that. And if someone lies about you in the press or tv then you have recourse to libel/slander etc. laws. True, Britain has no 'privacy' laws as such, but isn't that a good thing? As of this moment, the govt. are considering a privacy law, but it is unlikely to succeed. Why? Because any such law would benefit the priviledged and those in power. Privacy laws, while supposedly protecting the individual, help those in power hide their mistakes/scandals. They stop the press etc. investigating. Privacy laws are undemocratic - they prevent the people from keeping an eye on govt. And stop looking for some kinda conspiracy in the British press. It's hardly perfect, but your notion that they don't cover/campaign against press legislation, harrassment, discrimination, human rights etc. is plain wrong. You've never seen a British paper in yr life. You clearly have a specific case/individual in mind. Speak up! The thought police aren't coming round just yet. Douglas. ------------------------------- Date: Mon May 8 19:21:28 1995 Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy Subject: Re: BBC's Hidden Shame Confession time - the victim is/was me (except my name isn't Corley, but that's irrelevant). What happened was not threats; just invasion of privacy, in a partiicularly flagrant and shocking way, in a way which most people would consider to constitute harassment. You know there's a particular category of person with mental illness to whom TV and radio "talk", ie they feel the broadcast is directed at them in particular? This happpened to me, quite some time ago in the UK (I'm originally from London, so I've seen plenty of British media print and other). They invaded my home with their bugs, they repeated what I was saying in the privacy of my home, and they laughed that it was "so funny", that I was impotent and could not even communicate what was going on. Who did this? Our friends on BBC television, our friends in ITN, last but not least our friends in Capital Radio in London and on Radio 1. How did they do this? I'll give you an example. About a year ago, I was listening to Chris Tarrant (Capital Radio DJ among other pursuits) on his radio morning show, when he said, talking about someone he didn't identify, "you know this bloke? he says we're trying to kill him. We should be done for attempted manslaughter" which mirrored something I had said a day or two before (I'm not paranoid, honest!). Now that got broadcast to the whole of London - if any recordings are kept of the shows then it'll be there. 763 -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
