Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2007 21:21:39 GMT From: "Walt Kienzle" <wkienzlenospam.com> Subject: Re: Octane ratings.....what's the truth?
"Gary Fritz" <fritzxxxnospamrii.com> wrote in message news:Xns990AD9F437633fritzfriicomnospam168.3.50... > "Walt Kienzle" <wkienzlenospam.com> wrote: >> If you had an AERO, I might adjust my answer. >> That is were Wattenberg's "generally speaking" part kicks in. > > So you're saying if you have an Aero (I do, 9-5, 2002) that "generally > speaking" high-octane fuels ARE a scam? Why? No, I am saying the opposite because, generally speaking, high octane fuel is not needed. AERO's would be one of the exceptions. I'm glad you didn't say you have a Supercharged Buick Park Avenue. That car confuses me, I haven't determined if it follows the exception or the rule.
