Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 01:11:40 -0400 From: "John" <johnnospamg.org> Subject: Re: Octane ratings.....what's the truth?
"still me" <wheeledBobnospamo.com> wrote in message news:dd8i23ds8ua9soubp7me5vcbl7p905kkrenospamcom... > On 20 Apr 2007 02:44:14 GMT, Dave Hinz <DaveHinznospaml.com> wrote: > >>I was hoping for unbiased sources. Obviously you are incapable of >>providing same. > > Wrong conclusion. Once again, I invite you to do your own research. > >>At least you're nearing self-awareness. Let me guess - I've plonked you >>before and you've nym-shifted yet again, right? > > Aside from the fact that "plonking" is a habit of the truly lame, > you're even lamer - because you claim to plonk people and never do. > >>> Let me repeat: what happened in the 70's is irrelevant. What is today, >>> is. >> >>Riiiiight. So. One last try there sparky. Why should I believe this >>batch of idiots more than the batch of idiots 20 years ago? They both >>seem to have the same basic ideas, but with opposite results. What's >>the real deal, and why? Hint: if you respond with abuse, that weakens >>your credibility. Just so you know. > > Let me try one more time: what people said 20 years ago has no bearing > on the scientific realities today. Continually claiming that it does > really makes you look very foolish. > > Exposed: The Climate of Fear - Wednesday, May 2nd The Other Side of the Global Warming Debate CNN Headline News Channel http://www.glennbeck.com/tv/index.shtml
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
