"still me" <wheeledBobnospamo.com> wrote in message
news:ufdi331f9ph9jmtgemhet981k4q626bif5nospamcom...
> On Wed, 02 May 2007 20:36:58 -0400, GlassVial
> <glassvialnospamAM.hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>This article/link was already posted here earlier (at least to the GM
>>group)
>>
>>Agree with the Buick and Saab dumping, maybe Hummer, but not Pontiac.
>>
>>And even still, dumping those 2 brands won't completely turn the ship
>>around, there's a lot more work to do yet.
>
> GM doesn't have a clue. But neither does that writer.
>
> They continue to take brands with a loyal following and screw them up.
> Caddy has a core following - but instead of catering to it, GM
> continues to build Caddies that are not what the core caddy buyer
> wants. They did the same thing with Saab - a car with a loyal, almost
> cultish following. What do they do? They buy it and proceed to
> alienate the core buyers by pumping in lots of GM parts in lieu of
> Saab parts. Then, while speaking in the other direction, they re-label
> the POS Trailblazer as a Saab and rename a Subaru "Saab".
>
> While talking about establishing unique vehicles/brands, they continue
> to homogenize and lose core audiences. In the meantime, anyone who
> joins management and wants them to move past their moronic 1970's
> management and production model is quickly forced out.
>
> And the article writer says "keep Chevy". It may have a nice ring to
> it with some buyers, but it always has the worst reliability record of
> all the GM brands.
>
> All very amusing.
>
>
>
> They
GM thinks they can get away by beginning to sell rehashed Australian imports
also. Those who by GM want American not Australian 4 door BMW wannabees as
in the Pontiac G8.