Saabnet.com: General BB Post: Re: Side tracking aside, you have it backwards again

General Bulletin Board

Search:

[Main General Bulletin Board | Post Followup | FAQ ] [ Prev by Date ] [ Next by Date ] Member Login / Signup [Most Recently Edited Saabnet.com Photo Galleries]
Re: Side tracking aside, you have it backwards again
Posted by James (more from James) on Sat, 17 Dec 2011 10:44:56
In Reply to: Re: Side tracking aside, you have it backwards again, Reality, Sat, 17 Dec 2011 07:33:57

"most scientific minds would at least tentatively subscribe to a theory that explains observed phenomena / correlations in the simplest terms possible"

absolutely... but I would argue that advancements in automotive safety is a better simple explanation whereas you would argue people driving around yakking on cell phones + fiddling with gps is a better simple explanation. Perhaps you are correct. I doubt you are, but we can't know from the data.

I don't have any strong opinion re the cell phone law. I'm much more annoyed by the banning of studded tires. We all have our pet peeves + I don't fault you if you, as an individual, are careful with in car cell phone + gps use + find it frustrating to lose that functionality. That said, I can't say I necessarily agree with you that, on a population basis, cell phones + gps are likely making the roads safer... imho, you're grasping at straws to swing opinion to favour your bias vs a pet peeve... and that is *not* scientific...

James...

posted by 67.158.72...

Posts in this Thread:

Cellphones and driving, Noel , Wed, 14 Dec 2011 06:28:12
- Re: Cellphones and driving, Craig, Thu, 15 Dec 2011 10:40:55
  - Re: Cellphones and driving, Justin VanAbrahams, Thu, 15 Dec 2011 15:32:40
    - Then ban all cops and military pilots, Reality, Thu, 15 Dec 2011 22:10:55
      - Ever drive with a cop?, nwas, Sun, 18 Dec 2011 09:47:20
        Where do you think the military pilots get their, Reality, Sun, 18 Dec 2011 14:36:09
        Well, some of it anyway..., Noel , Mon, 19 Dec 2011 12:36:29
        Agree! I've seen cops do stuff that'd get, Noel , Sun, 18 Dec 2011 11:40:39
      - Not too impressed cops/pilots - but speaking of Greek, AeroBaron, Fri, 16 Dec 2011 10:46:03
        The guy should be banned!, Reality, Fri, 16 Dec 2011 11:37:53
        Yep on nanny, and su stuff es mi stuff NM, AeroBaron, Fri, 16 Dec 2011 11:55:55
      - I hold a radiotelephone operator's license, JohnA , Fri, 16 Dec 2011 10:43:48
        Do you honestly believe that a summer job skill set, Reality, Fri, 16 Dec 2011 11:42:54
        truck drivers/taxi drivers etc don't need licensing, JohnA , Fri, 16 Dec 2011 14:56:30
        Re: truck drivers/taxi drivers etc don't need licensing, Reality, Sat, 17 Dec 2011 07:09:06
        use of cellphone, JohnA , Sat, 17 Dec 2011 15:36:50
        Gullible fools still needed in the Jury box, Reality, Sun, 18 Dec 2011 13:56:54
- Here's a Study with N > 100,000,000, Reality, Wed, 14 Dec 2011 18:50:54
  - Dewey wins!, nwas, Thu, 15 Dec 2011 20:02:52
    - That's the exact position of the wannabe Nannies, Reality, Thu, 15 Dec 2011 22:18:56
      - Wrong, nwas, Fri, 16 Dec 2011 09:05:36
        Yes, You Are Wrong!, Reality, Fri, 16 Dec 2011 09:36:25
        Missing the point...., plap, Fri, 16 Dec 2011 11:43:21
        Yes, You Are Missing the Point, Reality, Fri, 16 Dec 2011 12:05:02
        Sorry, but you're still missing the point, nwas, Fri, 16 Dec 2011 15:06:31
        You have no legal right to be protected from anything, Reality, Fri, 16 Dec 2011 20:50:30
        Stop arguing for the sake of arguing!, Noel , Fri, 16 Dec 2011 11:04:39
        Very good additional points, Reality, Fri, 16 Dec 2011 11:25:56
        Yawn, nwas, Fri, 16 Dec 2011 15:12:46
        Now you are speaking the truth, Reality, Fri, 16 Dec 2011 20:39:50
  - or maybe cars have gotten safer in the past decade, or, AeroEd , Wed, 14 Dec 2011 19:21:35
    - Don't ban those movies, Reality, Wed, 14 Dec 2011 20:11:46
      - Correlation does not imply causation, AdamB , Thu, 15 Dec 2011 02:38:42
        Re: Correlation does not imply causation, Reality, Thu, 15 Dec 2011 05:54:29
        Re: Correlation does not imply causation, AdamB , Thu, 15 Dec 2011 14:22:31
        Re: Correlation does not imply causation, Reality, Thu, 15 Dec 2011 22:41:43
        automotive safety..., James, Fri, 16 Dec 2011 03:54:21
        IIHS has been in business since 1959!, Reality, Fri, 16 Dec 2011 05:37:52
        Re: IIHS has been in business since 1959!, James, Fri, 16 Dec 2011 08:17:42
        Side tracking aside, you have it backwards again, Reality, Fri, 16 Dec 2011 09:20:31
        Re: Side tracking aside, you have it backwards again, James, Fri, 16 Dec 2011 13:22:37
        Re: Side tracking aside, you have it backwards again, Reality, Fri, 16 Dec 2011 20:31:00
        Re: Side tracking aside, you have it backwards again, James, Sat, 17 Dec 2011 06:02:55
        Re: Side tracking aside, you have it backwards again, Reality, Sat, 17 Dec 2011 07:33:57
        Re: Side tracking aside, you have it backwards again, James, Sat, 17 Dec 2011 10:44:56
        Please do not mischaracterise my POV, Reality, Sat, 17 Dec 2011 21:44:42
        I apologize..., James, Sun, 18 Dec 2011 07:35:34
        Re: I apologize..., Reality, Sun, 18 Dec 2011 14:48:37
        Accident fatalities, Noel , Sun, 18 Dec 2011 05:18:25
        Re: Accident fatalities, Reality, Sun, 18 Dec 2011 14:56:36
        Re: Correlation does not imply causation, TML, Thu, 15 Dec 2011 06:05:11
        One more important assumption, Reality, Thu, 15 Dec 2011 07:14:47
        Re: One more important assumption, TML, Thu, 15 Dec 2011 08:04:22
        Re: One more important assumption, Reality, Thu, 15 Dec 2011 09:13:33
        Even a test like that assumes, Reality, Thu, 15 Dec 2011 07:07:28
        Re: Even a test like that assumes, TML, Thu, 15 Dec 2011 07:54:58
        Re: Even a test like that assumes, Reality, Thu, 15 Dec 2011 09:34:21
        once again, jeff in MD , Thu, 15 Dec 2011 09:47:03
        File that 3rd possiblity under "insigificant", Reality, Thu, 15 Dec 2011 09:58:52
        Re: File that 3rd possiblity under "insigificant", James, Thu, 15 Dec 2011 10:43:34
        Do you honestly believe, Reality, Thu, 15 Dec 2011 11:03:12
        Re: Do you honestly believe, James, Thu, 15 Dec 2011 11:17:14
        Re: Even a test like that assumes, James, Thu, 15 Dec 2011 08:12:08
        Thanks for pointing out Adeptation/Adaptation, Reality, Thu, 15 Dec 2011 09:47:39
        study link, jeff in MD , Thu, 15 Dec 2011 08:16:54
        another link, James, Thu, 15 Dec 2011 08:37:26
        Re: Even a test like that assumes, jeff in MD , Thu, 15 Dec 2011 07:31:12
        Agree, Reality, Thu, 15 Dec 2011 09:53:20
        I'm not conviced there was a study to begin with, Noel , Thu, 15 Dec 2011 08:21:20
        need to do research, jeff in MD , Thu, 15 Dec 2011 08:24:46
        They all have the wrong assumption, Reality, Thu, 15 Dec 2011 10:20:32
        Re: They all have the wrong assumption, James, Thu, 15 Dec 2011 10:50:11
        Re: They all have the wrong assumption, Reality, Thu, 15 Dec 2011 11:20:07
        Re: They all have the wrong assumption, James, Thu, 15 Dec 2011 11:28:58
        Re: They all have the wrong assumption, Reality, Thu, 15 Dec 2011 22:03:24
        Cell phones not the only distraction!, Noel , Thu, 15 Dec 2011 10:37:07
        Exactly! What will they ban next?, Reality, Thu, 15 Dec 2011 10:50:45
        I kind of agree with you..., James, Thu, 15 Dec 2011 11:02:20
        Re: I kind of agree with you..., Reality, Thu, 15 Dec 2011 22:27:25
        Re: I kind of agree with you..., James, Fri, 16 Dec 2011 04:06:54
        "It's not the end of the world", Reality, Fri, 16 Dec 2011 05:48:17
        I don't disagree..., James, Fri, 16 Dec 2011 08:36:07
        By that logic, Reality, Fri, 16 Dec 2011 09:51:31
        Re: Cell phones not the only distraction!, jeff in MD , Thu, 15 Dec 2011 10:47:56
        Texting probably the worst thing..., Noel , Thu, 15 Dec 2011 11:36:27
        round and around, jeff in MD , Thu, 15 Dec 2011 11:43:31
        Re: round and around, Noel , Fri, 16 Dec 2011 06:53:54
        Re: round and around, Real, Thu, 15 Dec 2011 22:23:17
        dialing!, James, Thu, 15 Dec 2011 10:55:37
        Voice Dialing and Voice to Text, Reality, Thu, 15 Dec 2011 11:10:25
- doesn't matter anyway, ryan, Wed, 14 Dec 2011 12:42:45
  - Texting while driving up 50 per cent in U.S., JohnA , Wed, 14 Dec 2011 13:01:15
    - Yet vehicular fatality did not increase, Reality, Wed, 14 Dec 2011 18:55:46
      - BTW, I don't smoke at all, Reality, Wed, 14 Dec 2011 19:01:47
        Re: BTW, I don't smoke at all, Ultimated , Thu, 15 Dec 2011 04:59:56
        Re: BTW, I don't smoke at all, Reality, Thu, 15 Dec 2011 05:57:59
    - keep me AWAY from these people! n/m, JohnA , Wed, 14 Dec 2011 13:01:53
- Re: Cellphones and driving, JohnA , Wed, 14 Dec 2011 06:36:40
  - Re: Cellphones and driving, JerseySaab , Wed, 14 Dec 2011 07:48:41
    - I suspect the research is less than accurate., Noel , Wed, 14 Dec 2011 10:16:47
      - Re: I suspect the research is less than accurate., Judge Edo, Wed, 14 Dec 2011 17:56:22
      - Re: I suspect the research is less than accurate., Simon S, Wed, 14 Dec 2011 14:46:13
      - The truth - do your own test, nwas, Wed, 14 Dec 2011 13:15:28
        Exactly the opposite for me, Reality, Wed, 14 Dec 2011 21:06:33
        maybe you're a "supertasker"..., James, Thu, 15 Dec 2011 08:28:56
        Hey, stop inflating my ego :-), Reality, Thu, 15 Dec 2011 10:27:29
        Re: Exactly the opposite for me, James, Thu, 15 Dec 2011 08:24:13
      - Re: I suspect the research is less than accurate., JerseySaab , Wed, 14 Dec 2011 10:36:11
        Re: I suspect the research is less than accurate., JohnA , Wed, 14 Dec 2011 12:39:06
        Re: I suspect the research is less than accurate., JerseySaab , Wed, 14 Dec 2011 15:31:03
        Re: I suspect the research is less than accurate., JohnA , Wed, 14 Dec 2011 17:45:45
    - Re: Cellphones and driving, JohnA , Wed, 14 Dec 2011 07:56:05
      - Re: Cellphones and driving, JerseySaab , Wed, 14 Dec 2011 07:57:39
        Re: Cellphones and driving, Erik919kt , Wed, 14 Dec 2011 08:56:46
        Re: Cellphones and driving, TML, Wed, 14 Dec 2011 08:33:06
        Re: Cellphones and driving, JerseySaab , Wed, 14 Dec 2011 09:46:24

Members can receive an alert when someone posts in this thread.

Post a Followup

Prev by Date: GM says "NO" yet again, JerseySaab, Sat, 17 Dec 2011 09:39:01
Next by Date: I am not a big fan of GM, but, Mike Johnson, Sat, 17 Dec 2011 10:47:02
Main General Bulletin Board

This is a moderated bulletin board - Posting is a privilege, not a right. Unsolicited commercial postings are not allowed (no Spam). Please, no For Sale or Wanted postings, SERIOUSLY. Classifieds are to be listed in The Saab Network Classifieds pages. This is a problem solving forum for over 250,000 Saab owners, so expect to see problems discussed here even though our cars are generally very reliable. This is not an anything goes type of forum. Saabnet.com has been a moderated forum since 1988. For usage guidelines, see the Saabnet.com Mission and Purpose Page. Please remember that you are not anonymous. Site Donations
Your address is: 67.202.9.192 - Using CCBot/2.0 - Logged.

Site Members do not see red text instructions, green links, and bottom of the page banners.
Click here to see all the Site Membership Benefits!

The content on this site may not be republished without permission. Copyright © 1988-2012 - The Saab Network - saabnet.com.