Date: Mon, 15 Jun 1998 19:09:36 -0700 From: "John Weiss" <jrweissnopsamet*NOSPAM*.com> Subject: Re: turbo vs. 900S convertible
What risk are you talking about -- risk of speeding tickets or risk of engine life? ;-) The 2.0 litre turbo is Saab's best-developed and longest-lived engine. It should be your first choice. I had a '91 900S Convertible with an automatic. DON'T get that combination -- it is SSLLOOWW!!! A 5-speed Turbo will be most fun, but an auto with the turbo is a reasonable 2nd choice. I have no experience with the 5-speed S, but suspect it would be reasonably quick. --------------------- John R. Weiss Seattle, WA Remove *NOSPAM* from address for e-mail reply jonnopsam.com wrote in message <6m3rf2$7b0$1nopsam1.dejanews.com>... >Is a used 900 turbo with the risk? How do they last when given decent >attention? Is the S version that much slower? > >Thx > >Jon > >-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==----- >http://www.dejanews.com/ Now offering spam-free web-based newsreading
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |