Date: 17 Jan 1999 22:37:34 GMT From: "Stuart Kunkler" <stukunopsamdnet.att.net> Subject: Re: 900 SE 6 - any good?
if my dealer is any indication, i think perhaps some additional trouble with the V-6 was that the dealer service people didn't want to learn how to service a gm product (?) <you have to admit that they lost a lot of their personality and beauty> and you have a point, too. had saab been rescued by bmw or mercedes, we wouldn't be having this conversation. i admit to having myself reacted with a little dismay at the merger. i mean...general motors? but if someone wants to spend his time on "should have" and "what if," he should become a philosophy professor. personally, i have a real business to run, and real kids to raise, and a really great car to drive, despite the gm stamp on numerous engine components. it just amuses me how some saab purists aren't dealing with the reality of the situation. stuart kunkler cincinnati, oh 86 900S 125K when traded 95 900SE (viva la V-6!) Johan LAUWERS wrote in message <77t6c9$dun$1nopsam3.Belgium.EU.net>... >You got a point there. I can just mention what my dealer's experience with >the V6 was. Nothing but trouble. Of course if it works it will drive fine, >every V6 does. But you have to compare. Indeed Saab was saved by GM but >you have to admit that they lost a lot of their personality and beauty. > >Johan. > >83 900 Gli >94 9000 CS >94 9000 CSE > >
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |