Date: Wed, 10 Feb 1999 00:20:15 +0100 From: "Simon Watkins" <106374.2647nopsamuserve.com> Subject: Re: SAAB 9-5 or Charysler 300M ?
Not seen the 300M's dash, but on the Saab 9-5.... I have to say that is one of the most ergonomically functional dashes I have ever encountered. Their aircraft expertise has certainly paid off with the incredible level of thought and attention to detail that has gone into it's design. As for build quality - far better dashboard than BMW or Mercedes (I have owned and driven both). As for being subject to GM's cookie cutter disease, you are simply wrong with respect to the dash. It is an evolution of all that has gone before - the similarities are plain to see, even for someone who hasn't looked all that closely - like you I would hazard a guess.... -- Spammers, here's some for you: fraudinfonopsamet.com sweep.daynopsam.gov.au ucenopsamgov Richard J Hutchinson wrote in message <36C09211.76E2F2A0nopsamcom>... > > >Johan LAUWERS wrote: >> >> >The same as what other cars? Compare the instrument panels of the two. >> >Compare the styling. Compare the room. It's the Saab that looks like >> >it's from a cookie cutter, not the 300M. >> >> I believe it is the Chrysler whose dashboard looks like a recycled plastic >> bag. >> >> Johan. > >compared to the Saab which looks like...what? > >I will now finish the sentence I started in another post: Saabs >now are infected with the GM cookie cutter disease; whereas >previously they just looked like Saabs. Ugly as sin. Send another >auto back......
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |