Date: Thu, 25 Nov 1999 12:15:42 -0800 From: Johannes Andersen <johannes.andersennopsamel.ac.uk> Subject: Re: quirky Saabs
Yes, that's it - the 9-5 does look heavy at the back. The estate is better if that is what's required, but it looks more like a domestic (family) carrier. The classic 900 ,I remenber, borrowed heavily from the 99 due to limited development funds. The bonnet looks very long compared to the main body of the car. The 3-doors look better balanced. The soft-top new 900 is the most popular soft-top here - mainly because it is a stylish car, but I never see the soft top down. The 9000 is really an italian design, these cars were very expensive in the beginning (1985+), they were really positioned as 'Jaguars' . The later CS/CD has a very strong solid look about them. /Johannes Martin Hilvers wrote: > > Johannes Andersen wrote: > > > > ...Which Saab car do you think look best - and worst ? > > best - a SAAB 95 from the front > worst - a SAAB 95 from the back > > -- > > MH ('77 96 '78 95 '79 96) > http://members.tripod.com/mhilvers/index.htm > Remove NOSPAM from E-mail address.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |