Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2000 14:23:26 +0200 From: "Arild Eik" <arild.eiknopsamatum.no> Subject: Re: 900=9-3, why isn't 9000=9-4?
You have to go back in time. Back to the Saab 95 (introduced in 1959) which was the first Saab station wagon and "the big brother" compared to Saab 93 (introduced in 1955): Saab 93 => 900 => 9-3 Saab 95 => 9000 => 9-5. Arild "Bobcat" <onopsamgt; wrote in message news:_eEn5.1126$TX2.49231nopsam.direcpc.com... > If the 900 became the 9-3, how come the > 9000 didn't become the 9-4 but ended up 9-5? > > Just wondering.... > >