Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2000 02:58:46 +0100 From: J <johsnopsamsafish.com> Subject: Re: 900=9-3, why isn't 9000=9-4?
Bobcat wrote: > > If the 900 became the 9-3, how come the > 9000 didn't become the 9-4 but ended up 9-5? > > Just wondering.... Simple: Pointers to corresponding beamers. Johannes